Skip to content
Home / Products / KAI-GeoEnergy
Energy · live preview

KAI-GeoEnergy: geothermal reservoir modelling, live preview

Know how the deep subsurface will respond, before and during geothermal or storage operations.

KAI-GeoEnergy

Geothermal, CO₂ and hydrogen storage models

Geothermal doublets, CO₂ stores and hydrogen stores all ask the same of the subsurface: take the pressure and temperature change, without fault slip, subsidence or leakage, for decades. The data to judge that is scattered across wells, seismic, laboratory tests and monitoring networks, and the uncertainty is rarely carried through.

KAI-GeoEnergy turns that data into one process-based model of your site, built on KAI-Subsurface and carried across the scales: rock types from core, bedding upscaled by flow, facies between the wells, then the reservoir. It simulates fluid flow, heat and stress for each operating plan. As monitoring data arrive, the ensemble of models is updated, giving you a living forecast of pressure, temperature, ground motion and seismic risk, with its uncertainty, in your own workspace.

What it does
  • Reservoir Lab: plan a doublet and see 30 years of temperature, heat and pressure with P10–P90, in your browser
  • Full ensemble runs on the KAI engine, queued from your workspace
  • KAI-Pilot: ask in plain words whether a doublet can deliver; every number linked to the run that produced it
  • Utah FORGE flagship case, every number from open notebooks
  • Heterogeneity kept from the plug to the reservoir, not averaged away
  • In build: fault-slip, subsidence and caprock checks, and CO₂ and hydrogen storage

Live preview: the Reservoir Lab runs in your browser and queues full simulations on the KAI engine from your free workspace. Results are simulated and labelled. Fault-slip, subsidence and storage modules are still in build.

Live previewKAI Reservoir Lab

Plan a geothermal doublet in your browser: 30 years, with the uncertainty shown

The third KAI lab. Place the wells, set the rates and the lab simulates flow and heat in the page: produced temperature, heat power, injector pressure and when cold water breaks through, each as a P10–P90 from an ensemble of rock models. Signed in, the same plan runs on the KAI engine.

  1. 1The bedPlug-to-Block Lab
  2. 2Between the wellsHeterogeneity Lab
  3. 3The reservoir, over yearsReservoir Lab · live preview
0.4 %difference from the open-source simulator open-DARTS on a 3D doublet: breakthrough at 4.906 against 4.924 years
1.7 °Cerror of the 3D temperature model against a measured log at Utah FORGE, down to 2,295 m
4.9 kg/shighest rate the FORGE well pair can take for 30 years without injecting above the minimum stress measured in well 16B (P10–P90 3.6–6.1); on the regional stress gradient it is 9.8 kg/s, see the case
+11 °Chow optimistic the usual coarse model is about the 30-year temperature; flow upscaled from the fine model cuts it to +2 °C
Flagship case · Utah FORGE, USA

Hot granite, 2 km down, and a well pair 100 m apart

Circulated at 10 kg/s, the test well pair cools from 207 °C to 126 °C over 30 years (P10–P90 114–143 °C): a test bed, not a power plant. The case shows why, what spacing and rate a 30-year doublet would need, and where the model still misses the measurements.

Simulated results. Data: Utah FORGE, U.S. Department of Energy, via the Geothermal Data Repository (OpenEI), CC BY 4.0.

One workflow across the scales

From the core plug to the reservoir, without losing what controls flow

Flow underground is decided by structures smaller than a log can see and larger than a core can hold. Most models average them away. KAI carries each property up the scales, from the plug to the bed, the ground between the wells and the whole reservoir, with process-based models of how the sediment was laid down, and keeps the uncertainty at every step. The two labs let you try the first steps in a browser.

  1. cmCore plug

    Quality-controlled core, rock types and permeability for uncored wells, tested blind.

    Zeerijp-3A case →
  2. cm–mBed

    Bedding models calibrated on the plugs, upscaled by flow: which sample gives a vertical permeability you can trust.

    Plug-to-Block Lab →
  3. m–kmBetween wells

    Facies ensembles conditioned on every log: the chance of good rock anywhere, and what a simplified model costs in flow.

    Heterogeneity Lab →
  4. kmReservoir

    The site model with flow, heat and stress simulated for each injection or production plan.

    Reservoir Lab →
  5. yearsOver time

    A digital twin: the ensemble updated as monitoring data arrive, so forecasts of pressure, temperature and ground motion stay current.

    The solution →
Why heterogeneity matters

A core plug can be a thousand times wrong about vertical flow

Plugs from the Groningen Rotliegend (well Zeerijp-3A) show vertical and horizontal permeability about equal. Ripple-laminated bedding models calibrated on the same plugs, upscaled by flow simulation, give a vertical-to-horizontal ratio of 0.003 to 0.05 at one metre when a fifth to two-fifths of the rock is mud. Plugs cut in the sandstone, where laboratories cut them, overstate vertical permeability 20 to 1,200 times. That ratio decides how a CO₂ or hydrogen plume rises, how pressure spreads, and when cold water reaches a geothermal producer.

Flaser, wavy and lenticular bedding templates as 3D blocks
Flaser, wavy and lenticular bedding templates, with their upscaled permeability
Plugs against the 1 m bedkv/kh of real plug pairs and of calibrated bedding
How far plugs overstate kvPlugs cut in clean sandstone, by mud fraction
  • Horizontal permeability settles within decimetres in sand-rich rock and follows the arithmetic average
  • Vertical permeability needs decimetres to a metre and moves towards the harmonic average as mud increases
  • Plugs cut in clean sandstone sit two to three orders of magnitude above the bed-scale vertical permeability
  • KAI-GeoEnergy builds this into the site model, so storage and geothermal forecasts keep the layers that control flow
On the platform today

Products you can use now

GroundWater Analyst
For water authorities, drillers, NGOs and farms

GroundWater Analyst

3D groundwater models from borehole records: water table, bedrock, aquifer layers, boreholes and flow, with cross-sections anywhere.

Free plan · paid from $149 per site

HydroSaaS
For industrial parks and factories

HydroSaaS

Water balance, pollutant loads and sources, demand and borehole drawdown, and effluent compliance against NEMA limits.

Free plan · paid from $99 per month

KAI-Hydro
For insurers, districts and agencies

KAI-Hydro

Parametric flood triggers back-tested against river gauges, and daily flood and drought forecasts ending in a plain Normal, Watch or Warning.

Free plan · paid from $190 per month

KAI-Subsurface
For energy operators and consultants

KAI-Subsurface

Fixed-price well-log interpretation, geomodels and AI property prediction between wells.

Free plan · paid from $490 per well

Guides

Guides on this topic

All KAI guides

Questions

KAI-GeoEnergy: questions and answers

What does KAI-GeoEnergy answer?

What a geothermal well pair (a doublet) will deliver over 30 years, and how sure you can be: produced temperature, heat and pressure with P10–P90 in the Reservoir Lab, and full ensemble runs on the KAI engine from your workspace.

Is KAI-GeoEnergy free?

It is in live preview: the Reservoir Lab, full runs and KAI-Pilot are free while we finish it. Paid plans are not open yet; preview users get an introductory price when they open.

What is KAI-Pilot?

The AI copilot in the Reservoir Lab. Ask a question in plain words; it answers on the Utah FORGE case from stored KAI engine runs (simulated results) and shows where every number comes from, with a provenance table and checks.

How far can I trust the Utah FORGE forecasts?

The temperature model is checked against the measured log in well 58-32 and the forecasts against the 2024 circulation tests. We publish the misfits too: tracers arrive 20 to 50 times later than the model says. Forecasts are simulated and labelled; the notebooks that reproduce every number are open on GitHub. See the Utah FORGE case.

All KAI-GeoEnergy questions →